Over and out.
Wow, I thought there might have been more substance added to the debate from JAM, but unfortunately the week I was gone, nothing of value was added.
Lying is an interesting thing. I am not quite sure what you are talking about, I know you don't have all the facts and are hell bent on showing it.
On a side note, the President of the United States of American doesn't TAKE THE LEAD from his advisors. He takes into consideration their advice. I would fire some of these advisors, but I know North Korea, Iran, Russia, and China wouldn't like that...
In bold - this was Dick Cheney.The CIA analysis has wasted the time of inspectors in Iraq while not leading to any progress on exposing Iraq's secret nuclear weapons program. Inspectors have had to spend an inordinate amount of time searching for evidence to prove or disprove the CIA analysis. Faced with overwhelming negative evidence from the inspectors, the proponents of this analysis have simply ignored the negative reports or act as if the CIA possesses secret information it cannot share. If the CIA has such secret evidence, it should share it rather than producing faulty technical analysis.
By ignoring technical evidence and pushing flawed analysis, the proponents of the CIA analysis undermine the credibility of the President, Secretary Powell, and the CIA. The attacks against those who disagree serve to show their defensiveness and a mean spirit.
This case serves to remind us that decision-makers are not above misusing technical and scientific analysis to bolster their political goals. The problem is that such a strategy denigrates the process of conducting impartial technical analysis and misleads the public.
If anyone is interested read the book "Fair Game" by Valerie Plame.
Totally agree.
It does become an issue when you have to speak on a radio, saying both does not add much to credibility or professional "Radio Speak".
Only good reason to keep GITMO open is to through in the Cheney, Rumsfield crowd.
LOL.
I thought it was more like Rush lost the wrestling match to Colin Powell.
This actually made me rethink defecting to the Democrats.
Good ole' Rush - same guy who calls the GI Bill "welfare" and lumps it in with food stamps and afdc.
you want to discuss Bill Clinton - start a new thread.
ciao.
"I dont see what you have against rush."
If you're not a woman...
If you're not against people using drugs...
If you're also hoping that our President fails....
If you're of color and don't mind that he couldn't possibly care less about you...
If you're a supporter of his and don't mind that he calls you a "loser"...
If you don't care that he is a hypocrite among many other things...
If you're not one of many republicans/independents that writhes in pain every time you hear that Limbaugh is the "face of the republican party"....
I don't know, I guess I could see why you like him.