Recommend you read this article if you're considering AFROTC

Herman_Snerd

5-Year Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2017
Messages
1,446
Over in the Room and Board tab yesterday, @DomerDad (thank you to OP) posted a related article - here is an official Washington Post article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/05/09/air-force-rotc-cadets/
that discusses how the AFROTC leadership makes cuts in deciding who moves forward with field training/ the second half of the ROTC program, including cutting people with no obvious standard deficits- based on the needs of the service.

Generally if you pass standards, pass NSI (Navy), pass Calc / Physics requirements (Navy option Navy),, avoid civic incidents, underage civic incidents, grades, are on-time, keep learning and growing, etc, the belief is that you move forward in Navy to commission - in fairness, hundreds who start don't commission and Navy weeds out too, even in one's last semesters. Same for Amy. But Air Force - well read the article and form your own opinion.

I wonder if just AFROTC took cuts or did they reduce the AF SA population last year? I don't know. But again data points if you're considering an academy or specific ROTC options.
 
Could someone with access to the article sum this up for those who do not have a subscription? There's a paywall. Thanks!
 
Could someone with access to the article sum this up for those who do not have a subscription? There's a paywall. Thanks!
Weird. No paywall for me and I am not a subscriber.

The biggest takeaway is that AFROTC is a 2+2 scholarship. It is only guaranteed for 2 years. The AF can decide not to send your ROTC cadet to field training after their 2nd year. This takes away their opportunity to commission and scholarship. In the past, no one really paid attention to this as nearly everyone who wanted a field training slot got one. Last year was a different story as the AF tried to balance force numbers by eliminating ROTC field training slots. It didn't go over well both inside and outside the AF. Then ended up reinstating about half of those cadets bringing it up to historical percentages.

This is what will likely drive my DS to West Point if he does not get into USAFA. He wants to be in the AF but, ultimately, wants a commission more. After last year's shake-up, he will go with a more guaranteed route to commission.
 
Just FYI that I don't see a paywall either, and yet - Sure - As you requested.

Summary: AF cutting many cadets after 2 years, not moving them on to field training and commission.
Most of the article details: ‘We cut too deep’: Air Force reinstates hundreds of ROTC cadets after dismissals spark backlash

The Air Force reversed its decision to dismiss hundreds of reserve officer training cadets and restored nearly 130 scholarships, officials said, after a lobbying effort assailed the decision as a punishment for many qualified cadets that would create catastrophic financial problems.

The pandemic’s wave of economic and social uncertainty triggered the initial decision, officials said. The natural cycle of departing officers creating room for the younger ranks has been disrupted, and service members, wary of leaving jobs and health care, are staying at the highest level in 2 decades.

To rebalance the numbers, the Air Force rejected far more cadets than in past years. The cuts were so drastic that they swallowed up cadets with excellent grades and high fitness marks, according to current and former Air Force officials, sending scores of families into financial panic after scholarships vanished.
Kaili Glasser, a 20-year-old studying mechanical engineering at MIT, said she has flawless grades and rows for the crew team. But her future career and scholarship imploded on a Zoom phone call with her commander on Apr. 20 when she learned of her rejection.

“It was heartbreaking to feel I wasn’t wanted after I put so much in,” she told The Washington Post.
Congressional representatives, retired officers and a wave of parents and students pressed the Air Force behind closed doors to reexamine decisions to reject 1,000 cadets, an Air Force official said. Policy officials relented Thursday evening, reinstating 400 cadets, about 130 of whom won back scholarships.

“We cut too deep,” said Ann Stefanek, an Air Force spokesperson. “We recognized that the planned reductions to meet end strength requirements were going to cause unanticipated hardships for many well-qualified cadets.”
Air Force officials acknowledged that cuts this year were far outside the norm. Historically, the Air Force dismisses about 25 percent of second-year cadets who don’t meet fitness, academic and leadership standards. This year, it cut nearly half of 2,300 cadets in the crucial lead up to junior year, when cadets begin field training.

Reinstating hundreds of cadets puts the rejection rate back into historical norms, Stefanek said. ROTC cadets attend civilian schools rather than service academies. Air Force cadets who stay for the full program commit to at least four years of service.

The reversal relieved stress that families have absorbed in recent weeks. Parents who have been relieved to forgo tuition were beset with panic about costs that in some cases would surpass $100,000.

Timing also compounded worries. The decision in late April fell well beyond transfer and scholarship application deadlines, leaving students marooned if they could not afford the changes.


Officials who oversee the ROTC program realized the gravity of the decision after hearing about the emotional and potential financial turmoil students and parents were put through, an Air Force official said.
The move was celebrated across the country. At Detachment 365 — which serves Harvard, MIT, Wellesley and Tufts — 10 out of nearly two dozen sophomores were cast out, including Glasser, she said. They learned of their dismissal together on a brief and surreal video call.

Glasser went into a tailspin, she said. Her father’s death when she was 14 was a catalyst to take more responsibility and find a way to pay for school. She carved a path to a full scholarship with the Air Force after embracing its culture and values, earning a NASA internship along the way.
She kept news of the rejection secret from her mother until Thursday, when she learned she was reinstated, scholarship and all. She was hit by a wave of relief, but the episode shook Detachment 365 into a more clear-eyed view of military bureaucracy, she said.
“Until now, I had very full trust in the Air Force,” she said. “It wasn’t until this past month that I realized that’s not always how it’s going to be.”

The detachment saw eight total candidates reinstated, bringing a flash of joy tempered with disappointment in Air Force leaders. “Integrity is essential,” wrote one cadet in a group chat discussing the episode, reciting cadet core values they felt were breached.
“This should have never happened,” said one reinstated cadet, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of concern for consequences. “The only thing that got them to reverse their decision was attention from outside.”
The detachment, loaded with STEM-focused students at elite colleges, was also shaken over who was initially dismissed from its ranks — five women and five minorities. The military, which has struggled to elevate minority officers into senior commands, has pledged to do better.

“Cutting off the flow of high-performing women is misguided,” she said. “The lack of intention is the issue.”
There are some ways to reduce the number of officers in uniform who may be stagnant or at retirement, she said, like offering buyouts, or even putting them into undesirable duties to accelerate their exit.
But most solutions are at the entry point, rather than the exit, she said. Air Force officials said to account for the reinstated cadets they may reduce future slots for officer candidate school, which is a separate program.
Cadets now back on track for training have resolved to take leadership lessons from the episode.
“You can grow and develop while the Air Force does the same,” Glasser said. “In 20 years, we shouldn’t be the ones making the same mistake made this year.”
 
In short at least partially

They rejected approx 1000 AFROTC cadets. one for example who got a reject was someone in the article , on the row team, at MIT , and had great grades . Many were doing very well.

After an outcry they restored 400. About 130 of those got their scholarship restored.
 
Over in the Room and Board tab yesterday, @DomerDad (thank you to OP) posted a related article - here is an official Washington Post article: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2021/05/09/air-force-rotc-cadets/
that discusses how the AFROTC leadership makes cuts in deciding who moves forward with field training/ the second half of the ROTC program, including cutting people with no obvious standard deficits- based on the needs of the service.

Generally if you pass standards, pass NSI (Navy), pass Calc / Physics requirements (Navy option Navy),, avoid civic incidents, underage civic incidents, grades, are on-time, keep learning and growing, etc, the belief is that you move forward in Navy to commission - in fairness, hundreds who start don't commission and Navy weeds out too, even in one's last semesters. Same for Amy. But Air Force - well read the article and form your own opinion.

I wonder if just AFROTC took cuts or did they reduce the AF SA population last year? I don't know. But again data points if you're considering an academy or specific ROTC options.
They had an excess of people remain that they expected to leave, especially pilots, due to covid and airline industry impacts.
 
I find it interesting that this policy was in part based on airline industry impacts. My husband works for major airline and the majors are fighting against each other to for qualified applicants. There is an airline hiring boom and it’s been going on for at least six months.
 
I find it interesting that this policy was in part based on airline industry impacts. My husband works for major airline and the majors are fighting against each other to for qualified applicants. There is an airline hiring boom and it’s been going on for at least six months.
Yes, which implies 9-12 months ago, when these decisions were made, the boom wasn't going on. Hopefully things will improve for all this year.
 
I was able to read the article, dated May of ‘21. I recall a very upset mom speaking to this last year…her son was dropped.

Could this also play into/parallel what a couple posters here have spoken to, regarding medical separation, at USMA 🤔?? The ‘loss of the golden handshake’??
 
Last edited:
I find it interesting that this policy was in part based on airline industry impacts. My husband works for major airline and the majors are fighting against each other to for qualified applicants. There is an airline hiring boom and it’s been going on for at least six months.
Lol…what you just posted is so very typical of the military - and big corporations, big government, etc. When cuts are ordered, the folks at the top managing the “system” look around the table at each other and see only essential workers - and then cut the unseen worker bee in the trenches…
 

Attachments

  • 472162F1-EF05-4FB8-A189-0DAE0539953B.jpeg
    472162F1-EF05-4FB8-A189-0DAE0539953B.jpeg
    113.6 KB · Views: 18
All I can tell you is that the pilots who stuck around because of Covid arent doing so anymore. Dont know how this affects total number of needed officers, but they were being shortsighted when they cut so many people from Rotc
 
For fun: I recommend the USAF hire Chuck Woolery and use his "Love Connection" slogan, "We'll be back in 2 and 2" campaign in their AFROTC recruitment next year to ensure candidates know Type 1 and Type 7 scholarship recipients are actually signing up for a 2 year scholarship or opportunity, and then each of them have to re-compete for the invite-only opportunity to go to field training, continue on scholarship, and serve..

I was hoping this would kick off some discussion. Great points from other posters above.

1646143124907.png
 
Enrollment allocation slots for Field Training have been released today. I wonder how the selection rate compares to last year. This is definitely something to consider when looking into AFROTC, otherwise, the program is awesome!
 
While all cadets in DD's unit received training slots, only 1 of 5 cadets received a rated slot.
 
While all cadets in DD's unit received training slots, only 1 of 5 cadets received a rated slot.
Well, it’s good that they all received training slots! The national selection rate was 82%, except for a lot of cadets were not even considered due to not being completely cleared medically by the deadline. Congrats to your DD if she was one of those who received one!
 
Back
Top