Title IX

aidanrockne

5-Year Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2015
Messages
112
Probably a dumb question, but here goes. My understanding is that military academies are exempt from Title IX. If that's true, and if that means that military academies can offer as many "scholarships" to male athletes as female athletes, is there a reason why USNA does not have, for example, Division 1 men's volleyball? Is it a funding issue as opposed to a federal regulation issue?
 
And, by the way, I put "scholarships" in quotes because I know that everyone at the academies are effectively at the school on the same scholarship, division 1 athletes and non-athletes alike!
 
This is an older article (1993) from The Baltimore Sun. I couldn't put in the link, but it's short enough to cut-and-paste.

Citing factors that include the interests of the Brigade, th mandated reduction of the academy's Brigade and budget reductions, the U.S. Naval Academy announced yesterday the elimination of four varsity sports.

Gone are men's volleyball, men's and women's fencing and women's gymnastics. In other moves, women's soccer was elevated to varsity status, and pistol was shifted from a varsity sport to club status.

Navy athletic director Jack Lengyel spent much of yesterday talking to members of teams that are affected by the announcement.

"The teams all, obviously, share concerns," Lengyel said. "The reality of downsizing is such that when you're affected, it's tough to accept. There's a lot of frustration, and I share in their feelings."

The announcement comes after an 18-month study of Navy's athletic program. The academy studied areas that included availability of competition, revenue potential and media and fan interest in making the final decision, Lengyel said.

Fifteen percent of the Brigade was surveyed for input. "We just didn't cut programs, we reviewed all the programs," Lengyel said. "We've trimmed costs off of all of our sports."

The trimming comes at a time when the academy is faced with a congressionally mandated reduction of the Brigade from 4,500 in 1990 to 4,000 in 1995, as well as being faced with a budget reduction.

The elevation of women's soccer to varsity status helps Navy maintain the nine women's sports necessary to maintain Division I status.

"Plus, women's soccer is one of the fastest growing sports with 80 percent of our [female] applicants having played it," Lengyel said. "Women are 11 percent of our enrollment, yet represent 18 percent of our athletic participation. Gender equity is one of our major concerns, and we certainly more than fulfill our mandate."

Navy's elimination of two fencing teams and men's volleyball affects sports that are not widely popular among National Collegiate Athletic Association schools.

There are 26 men's fencing teams among Division I schools and 46 NCAA schools overall; women's fencing is a sport at 25 Division I schools and 44 overall; and men's volleyball is played at 24 Division I schools and 59 altogether.

None of the four sports cut was a member of the Patriot League, in which most of Navy's teams participate. Pistol is not an NCAA sport.

Despite the moves, Navy still has 29 intercollegiate sports. According to the 1991-92 NCAA annual report, the average number of sports for NCAA Division I programs was 18.
 
That article is pretty dated. Not sure about compliance with Title IX but I would venture to say they do. It’s a federal statue and after all its a federal school with federal dollars. 30 sports for a school of 4K students is a lot. And then another 17 or so at the club level. I think Stanford might be the only D1 school that offers this many sports for such a small student body. It’s a funding, space, balancing athletes vs non- athletic student body. I think they are all factors.
 
USNA has a lot of varsity sports, for both men and women. And many club sports. There are changes to the programs from time to time for all sorts of reasons. Don’t really understand the question re “scholarships” because, as the OP notes, no one at USNA is paying financially for their education.

Jack Lengyel retired from USNA in 2001, so as OldNavyBGO said, the article is very dated. If you go to navy sports.com, you can find the current list of varsity sports.
 
The other thing I didn’t realize, is that there are also competitive level sports, just under varsity level. Competitive teams still travel and compete all over at a very high level. Below that is the intramural level. Basically ‘for fun’.
 
I acknowledged that it was an old article. But it appears that 1993 was the year that Men's Volleyball got transitioned to a club sport, which is why I thought it was interesting enough to post. At least I didn't see any newer articles showing that it went back to a varsity sport. Actually, it's a moot point in my opinion. These club teams are just as competitive and the athleticism shown matches many varsity programs. I was at West Point last spring on a day an Ultimate Frisbee tourney was going on. It was crazy.
 
As a former D1 athlete I didn't believe that USNA could be exempt from Title . So I googled it. Shockingly they are

Schools training individuals for military services or merchant marine (completely exempt)
Title IX does not apply to an educational institution the primary purpose or which is the training of individuals for the military services of the United States or the merchant marine. 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a)(4); 34 C.F.R. § 106.13.


https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-rel-exempt/index.html
 
If memory serves, men's VB was a club sport in my day. It obviously achieved varsity status for a short time after which it apparently went back to club.

As noted, there are all sorts of reasons a sport may be a club or varsity and move back & forth between the two. Funding, support, popularity, cost, number of other sports, league play, etc. are all part of the mix.

Some club sports are uber-competitive. For example, a year ago, the women's club softball team won the national club sport championship, defeating (I think) AZ State.
 
As a former D1 athlete I didn't believe that USNA could be exempt from Title . So I googled it. Shockingly they are

Schools training individuals for military services or merchant marine (completely exempt)
Title IX does not apply to an educational institution the primary purpose or which is the training of individuals for the military services of the United States or the merchant marine. 20 U.S.C. § 1681(a)(4); 34 C.F.R. § 106.13.


https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/t9-rel-exempt/index.html

They are exempt, but an SA athletic department told me they try to adhere as closely as possible if not more.
 
I can’t imagine USNA is out of compliance with the amount of sports they offer for both genders. I would imagine they are exempt because of admissions standards and the ratio of men vs women is so different compared to a non-SA.
 
Back
Top