I agree with LITS and what he is stating.
Luigi, at the end of the day when have you ever known all other things being equal in politics? It never is.
Do I place weight on their position regarding the military as far as budget and op tempo? Yes, but serving in the military will not make me pull the lever for you. Kerry served AD, I didn't vote for him. Their ideology is what I base my decision.
I care more about how my tax dollars are spent and recognizing gay marriage than if the candidate served 5, 10 or 20 yrs. If a dem that never served is on the same page and a republican that has served isn't, I am voting dem. Let's be honest, to find an R that is on my page would be equivalent to finding a needle in a haystack.
nick4060 said:
If you want to serve and lead other people, there are a lot of ways to do that. You don't have to commit to the military to do it. Like I said in my last post, its not fair to the airmen or sailors you'd be working with if your heart isn't in it.
If you truly do want to be a military officer - Your question should be "How can I be a good military officer?", not "How can being a military officer make me a good politician?"
Deshawn,
Honestly nobody is saying you should not go down this route. We are really trying to stress to you that you have not investigated the military life enough.
There are always candidates and applicants that are waivering between branches, or career fields, but still they have a military career goal. I don't think anyone here even understands why you have decided AF or Navy. You have yet to say anything more than political reasons. I am curious why not the Army? Don't want to be in the Army, okay, but at least, I feel you have investigated to some level regarding the military. I don't feel that currently.
Secondly, I don't think you have taken the time to grasp how AF/NROTC works.
Both branches, have the same make or break yr. (soph in college).
AFROTC requires you to attend SFT. Scholarship is what the military calls "masked" for the selection board. In other words it is all about your AFROTC stats. Don't get selected, and you are dis-enrolled. No POC, no commissioning. Take the time to pull up old SFT threads, to see it is very competitive, cgpa for Poli Sci (non-techs) need to be in the 3.3.-3.4 range. Tech is @3.1 cgpa. Not an easy feat...pull 1 semester of 3.0 as a non-tech and you only have 2 semesters to get it to a 3.3...basically you need one semester at a 3.5, and another at 3.4.
NROTC is different. I will allow others to correct me if I am wrong. Soph yr is also make or break if you are not on scholarship. You must meet a board and get "contracted" at the end of that yr. Again, like AFROTC it is NATIONAL. It is highly competitive, and techs get an edge. Do not contract, same deal as AFROTC, disenrolled.
Bullet discussed the cart and the horse issue. You have to acknowledge that you have many carts right now.
Nobody knows your PAR, nor your PFA/CFA, ECs and the OMG issue of DoDMERB.
Throttle back. You want Norwich, you want AF or Navy, how about giving stats now. Leave your political aspirations at the door, let's address if you are competitive to even get into Norwich or get a scholarship. Signing up for ROTC does not equate into pinning on butter bars.