> I would be curious what Service Academy this person represents, what level (ie. a BGO/FFR/ALO), and whether the statement represents official policy from a particular Service Academy. I have never heard such a comment or policy from USNA. In fact, most briefings and discussions I have seen and participated in suggest that the Ivy's are our main "competition", not other Service Academies. I would expect that other Service Academies have similar viewpoints, and highly doubt this is an official policy statement from any Service Academy. If a statement from a local rep like BGO/FFR/ALO, keep in mind that we all have independent opinions and bias' , and some people are naturally more competitive and may make statements like this.
> I disagree. BGO's are not recruiters, and we don't get points for meeting quota's and getting kids into Service Academies. This is not an issue to me, as I always ask how they got interested in USNA, what other schools (not just Service Academies) they are applying to, whether they applying for NROTC or other ROTC's, and the rationale behind their choice. I usually get a pretty good feel for a Candidate's interest and motivation from that discussion, and can quickly tell if someone is BS'ing me.
Personally, I don't care if USNA is your 2nd choice as long as your reasoning is sound. I never denigrate another Service Academy,but I will be quick to correct faulty information and perceptions, as well as explain , what I perceive to be the benefits of USNA over other Service Academies.