A1Janitor
5-Year Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2018
- Messages
- 6,534
A different angle - candidate a has a chance to compete with set A of 9 other candidates and set B of 9 other candidates whereas the next candidate has the chance to compete only against set B of 9 other candidates. The second nomination provided more than nothing. It provided another field to compete on. That was my original objection.
As to the idea of two nominations not making you more competitive from a WCS or whatever the scoring rubric is called, I’d agree with that notion.
I will bow out. I said there is another slate to compete on.
But - we don’t know if the extra one improves odds or not.
For instance - what if the candidate is the best on MOC but the eighth best on Senate slate. We don’t have the info to know if it improves odds of appointment or not.