- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Messages
- 2,265
The way I read it, it was sent back to the Academy?? We know a senior on the team, but don’t know any details.When they say sent home. Does that mean they were kicked out of the academy or sent back to the academy?
Hazing? Really?? This is still happening??? I hope that is not the case again here. Pardon me for saying so, but IMHO the USAFA administrators need to quit the #NCLS2018 grandstanding and fix this $#!+ which goes on under their collective noses once and for all.
Barely. Not at all the way it is described in this article. Probably because of the new definitions of hazing.And, BTW, "first shirt/first snow" is still active at the Academy.
It's possible that the two that weren't at the conference meet didn't make the travel squad. There's typically a limit on the number of swimmers from each team that can compete.Be interesting to follow this. They could or done something huge or something that is more related to breaking team rules than a major conduct violation. Also, it said 9 of 11... so 2 weren’t swimming or maybe team trainers of some kind?
Hazing serves a purpose. Of course it all needs to be legal and done safely. It’s a rite of passage.Hazing? Really?? This is still happening??? I hope that is not the case again here. Pardon me for saying so, but IMHO the USAFA administrators need to quit the #NCLS2018 grandstanding and fix this $#!+ which goes on under their collective noses once and for all.
I don't think it so much that it is still happening, in so much as the new definition of hazing. Many would be amazed at what is considered hazing these days. It seems our society has redefined hazing, bullying, etc. to include some very innocuous actions. I'm not saying the swimmers actions were this trivial, but, I think your reaction is a bit melodramatic.
Hazing serves a purpose. Of course it all needs to be legal and done safely. It’s a rite of passage.
Regardless, whatever scandal this is, odds are it's fairly isolated to the swim team. I don't know if I think hosting NCLS and conducting a conduct investigation for a relatively small group of athletes are mutually exclusive actions for USAFA leadership.
Sending home 11 cadets is definitely “dealing with it”. Most schools this happens and you’d never hear about it. I don’t get any glare of irony.Regardless, whatever scandal this is, odds are it's fairly isolated to the swim team. I don't know if I think hosting NCLS and conducting a conduct investigation for a relatively small group of athletes are mutually exclusive actions for USAFA leadership.
Agreed. Yet, it's hard to understand how an organization that spends so much time (based on their literature and social media) talking about character, leadership, ethics and respect for human dignity could still be wrestling with scandals on what seems to be some regularity. The irony is glaring, which makes me wonder where the priorities are... is it public relations? or effective leadership of (not completely mature) students?