Pima
10-Year Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 13,900
I am curious regarding one thing.
Does she intend to fight paying back the 80K? I may have missed this in the article, but I don't recall her stating she is going to fight the reimbursement.
I thought this was about her moral character coming out and being billed.
Maybe, she is fine with being released and repaying the 80K. Maybe this was her fall on a sword moment and is willing to accept the consequences. If she is fine with being released and paying back the 80K the thread is moot, EXCEPT if people believe she knew she was homosexual when accepting the scholarship and she did this intentionally to make an issue regarding DADT. If she intentionally accepted a scholarship knowing she would announce she was homosexual to highlight the DADT, then I say GOOD RIDDANCE! I say that because she is a selfish person. She had no intention of serving and took a spot for another ROTC cadet. That is pure unbridled selfishness, be darned that the military could have spent that money for another soldier, she had a point to be made at whatever the cost was.
Not saying that was her intention. I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, but I think we should wait and see her response if she is required to repay the scholarship. Her words will prove what her true motivation was regarding DADT.
Does she intend to fight paying back the 80K? I may have missed this in the article, but I don't recall her stating she is going to fight the reimbursement.
I thought this was about her moral character coming out and being billed.
Maybe, she is fine with being released and repaying the 80K. Maybe this was her fall on a sword moment and is willing to accept the consequences. If she is fine with being released and paying back the 80K the thread is moot, EXCEPT if people believe she knew she was homosexual when accepting the scholarship and she did this intentionally to make an issue regarding DADT. If she intentionally accepted a scholarship knowing she would announce she was homosexual to highlight the DADT, then I say GOOD RIDDANCE! I say that because she is a selfish person. She had no intention of serving and took a spot for another ROTC cadet. That is pure unbridled selfishness, be darned that the military could have spent that money for another soldier, she had a point to be made at whatever the cost was.
Not saying that was her intention. I am willing to give her the benefit of the doubt, but I think we should wait and see her response if she is required to repay the scholarship. Her words will prove what her true motivation was regarding DADT.
Last edited: