- Joined
- Apr 9, 2017
- Messages
- 9,358
Wow. Visiting the Dant if you don’t purchase? Now THATS marketing!
They look exactly the same - just a slightly different color due to the difference in metals. It is still the USNA crest on one side and theAnyone have pictures of the combat ring vs. the gold?
I agree with your sentiments. I am not as OG as some on here. But was around for much higher attrition. It was a symbol of we are making it. If you got the boot or resigned after you got your ring you could sell it back to off set any costs owed. So basically it was… only those who made it, have one. It was sense of pride that we had were on our to making it and eventually making it.As for going to the Dant, in the old days, the overwhelming majority of mids seemed so totally excited to get their rings that the very idea of not getting one was hard even to conceptualize. Thus, there was a sense of "What sane person would not want a ring?" Maybe not fair, but that's the way it was. I'm sure some folks bought rings because they were "supposed to" not because they wanted to -- but I also think it was a very small minority.
IMO, that view was in part due to the ring symbolizing being a member of an exclusive group -- your graduating class. Not better than any other group, just the symbol of membership. The other part was, as mentioned earlier, the reward / symbol of surviving USNA at a time when many great people did not. Today, it's rare for someone who wants to graduate not to do so. That was not the case when my class graduated.
Anyone have pictures of the combat ring vs. the gold?
Do you guys remember the thread from a USMA person that was separating, and USMA required that they return their ring? That was fascinating....I agree with your sentiments. I am not as OG as some on here. But was around for much higher attrition. It was a symbol of we are making it. If you got the boot or resigned after you got your ring you could sell it back to off set any costs owed. So basically it was… only those who made it, have one. It was sense of pride that we had were on our to making it and eventually making it.
2/c is definitely the cynical year. They can’t wait for those useless 1/c to graduate and get out of their way so they can run the place the way it should be. They have strong opinions on the leadership skills of the Commandant and his staff and what’s wrong with USNA in general. That is stereotyping, of course, but we have heard it from generations of sponsor mids in the family and know it’s part of the maturation process. There is a sea change between 2/c and 1/c year.Thanks for all the thoughtful responses-I learned more about rings than I knew existed! My wife and I want DS to get a ring because 20 years down the road, he’d wish he did. What seems unimportant at 22 is not what’s important at 42. The level of young adult cynicism I sometimes get these days ... after this last 15 months... let’s just say it’s a bit unexpected from this young man.
Apparently that is not just a USNA thing. I remember some cynicism and "can't wait to be done" during 2/c year. 1/c year was much different.2/c is definitely the cynical year. They can’t wait for those useless 1/c to graduate and get out of their way so they can run the place the way it should be. They have strong opinions on the leadership skills of the Commandant and his staff and what’s wrong with USNA in general. That is stereotyping, of course, but we have heard it from generations of sponsor mids in the family and know it’s part of the maturation process. There is a sea change between 2/c and 1/c year.
My son didn't insure his and it was stolen a couple years after he graduated [Kings Point]. The replacement cost was nearly double what he paid for the original ring.. ouch indeed! Here's his new one..I think I posted on another ring thread a while back that one cadet in his class designed a $13K ruby ring that got lost (stolen?) before graduation. It was insured, but ouch. Don't be that cadet.
For USNA as well we sign a contract that states we must return it for a refund if for some reason we do not graduate. I believe it also stipulates that we can’t sell it or give it away for someone else to wear it. Something along those lines at least. (I’d expect they are often kept as family heirlooms after a graduate passes away). A quick online search shows some Academy rings for sale on Ebay which definitely appears to violate the spirit of the ring tradition.Do you guys remember the thread from a USMA person that was separating, and USMA required that they return their ring? That was fascinating....
The OTHER thing about these rings, is the whole “link in the chain” piece. These rings contain metal from those that have gone before. It’s really more than a ring...the symbolism, to me, of belonging to that group cannot be overstated imo. It’s not just a piece of jewelry. It has Metal from others, and is actually dipped in the water from the 7seas. In a ceremony. There is meaning there. Imo. Not better than any other group like stated already...not at all...just the brother/sisterhood of ‘GROUP USNA’.
I would bet the majority of the ones on Ebay are the stolen ones. Sad. And also sad if it is a grad selling it IMHO.For USNA as well we sign a contract that states we must return it for a refund if for some reason we do not graduate. I believe it also stipulates that we can’t sell it or give it away for someone else to wear it. Something along those lines at least. (I’d expect they are often kept as family heirlooms after a graduate passes away). A quick online search shows some Academy rings for sale on Ebay which definitely appears to violate the spirit of the ring tradition.
Please reassure me he has personal property insurance with a valuable property rider now! That was strongly suggested to me at OCS to protect uniforms, sports gear, music tech, jewelry, all my “stuff.”
Yes.. once bitten twice shy.. He now has Valuable Personal Property [VPP] coverage for his ring through USAA. As I recall it was pretty inexpensive.My son didn't insure his and it was stolen a couple years after he graduated [Kings Point]. The replacement cost was nearly double what he paid for the original ring.. ouch indeed! Here's his new one..
Please reassure me he has personal property insurance with a valuable property rider now! That was strongly suggested to me at OCS to protect uniforms, sports gear, music tech, jewelry, all my “stuff.”
Best move I made back then. Covered stuff still at family home, in storage, in my car, in hotel rooms, overseas, wherever.Yes.. once bitten twice shy.. He now has Valuable Personal Property [VPP] coverage for his ring through USAA. As I recall it was pretty inexpensive.
One more thought for you - DH and I both graduated USNA same year - both of us have class rings. I wear mine every day. I think I've seen him wear his once in 32 years. My synthetic and inexpensive stone is practically rounded, rather than faceted, by now. We were talking about this post and our rings and he offered that he doesn't feel the need for a ring at all - it's too big and uncomfortable and not something he normally wears. I wear mine hiking, kayaking, gardening, sailing - whatever we are doing. While DH might not care about his ring, his original USNA sailing sweatshirt has so many holes in it, it is more air than fabric. But it's still here and he still wears it and probably will for the next 30 years. It sounds like your DS can get a ring later if he so desires, and for now - maybe there is some other item he will take with him that will symbolize his class, his community and all of the experiences of the last 4 years.Thanks for all the thoughtful responses-I learned more about rings than I knew existed! My wife and I want DS to get a ring because 20 years down the road, he’d wish he did. What seems unimportant at 22 is not what’s important at 42. The level of young adult cynicism I sometimes get these days ... after this last 15 months... let’s just say it’s a bit unexpected from this young man.