Colleges and SA's revoke acceptances every year for a variety of reasons. Hopefully, the test case for the double commitment issue will not come after someone unwittingly follows misinformed advice on this topic.
The majority of college applicants sign the agreement against double commitments - the process is much more cumbersome without it because you can't use the Common Application.
NO ONE on this forum knows what an SA would do to a candidate reported violating it. There is no known case where an SA admissions office ignored a reported violation. No SA has issued a position statement on the matter of maintaining a Plan B in violation of an agreement.
I don't think an SA would revoke an appointment for violating an agreement against double committing and it would take a real jackass to report it to an SA. But that is just my opinion. Making a definitive statement about lack of consequences for violating a written agreement, with no evidence, would be a disservice to those seeking accurate information.
The majority of college applicants sign the agreement against double commitments - the process is much more cumbersome without it because you can't use the Common Application.
NO ONE on this forum knows what an SA would do to a candidate reported violating it. There is no known case where an SA admissions office ignored a reported violation. No SA has issued a position statement on the matter of maintaining a Plan B in violation of an agreement.
I don't think an SA would revoke an appointment for violating an agreement against double committing and it would take a real jackass to report it to an SA. But that is just my opinion. Making a definitive statement about lack of consequences for violating a written agreement, with no evidence, would be a disservice to those seeking accurate information.