JDB
5-Year Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2016
- Messages
- 56
Forumjunkie, not sure anyone one here went to that extreme. Understand you are being sarcastic, or at least I think you are, but why take it to this level? I don't think anyone said to do this in vacuum as An Army of One. There will be many candidates who do. Other candidates will have parents check things over, remind them of deadlines, etc. The only few items I can remember my parents being involved in any of it was driving me to my dodmerb physical, MOC interview and drop stuff at the post office (before portals existed). They never filled out a documents for me, knew when things were due or made my calls. I can tell you that was the norm for my classmates. Some had parents who did help read essays, proof paperwork and reminded them of deadlines. I don't see anything wrong with these items. Sure we can have different opinions and stances on this stuff. My opinions might not be of others and that is fine. Everyone's families are different, I get that. I have voiced where I think the line is for a candidate (and when I say candidate I mean a current senior applying to USNA... not talking about recruitment or other items) and why. It's fine to disagree with that.
I think the idea that a candidate should "own" (can't think of a better term) the process of applying to an SA is valid for all the reasons mentioned; parents clearly should not "own" the process. The appropriate level of parental involvement probably needs to consider a lot of factors and is, I think, a personal decision between the parent and child.
My DD and DS both applied to USNA in the last few years (DD is USNA class of 2019, DS was not accepted and is at a SMC on ROTC scholarship). When DD applied, she did everything on her own. DW and I know almost nothing about the mechanics of the application process because we weren't involved, other than getting general updates from DD. We did drive her to appointments as necessary and sat in on a portion of the BGO interview. When DS came along his sister guided him somewhat with general suggestions having just gone through the process, but she was a Plebe with little free time. Again with DS, we were not involved much.
For us, parental involvement mainly consisted of "pumping the brakes" a bit to make sure USNA was what they really wanted since both were so gung ho about it. Not that we were against their chosen path, just that we wanted to make sure they were considering all available options and making a thoughtful decision about their future. Other parents may feel the need to get involved in other ways, based on their own circumstances. To me, stating that the candidate should own the process doesn't necessarily mean that any level of parental involvement is a terrible thing. In my opinion, being involved as a parent should not cross the line into taking on responsibility of owning the process.
Just my 2 cents to throw on the pile...
The above is well stated. No one is suggesting parents shouldn't be interested and involved -- but the kid/candidate needs to be the one driving the process.
For those candidates who are "too busy" as h.s. juniors/seniors to call their MOC office or email their RD . . . they are in for a rude awakening come I-Day. I guarantee their lives will be much, much busier at USNA than in h.s. And there will be LOTS of military requirements, both large and small, that they are expected to make happen despite their super-busy schedules as plebes. And mommy and daddy won't be there to help.
Parents, you can be a tremendous help to your kids as they navigate the SA process. You can provide advice on when to call and what to say, what to wear to interviews, help them with practice questions, proofread their essays, help them decide whether the military is right for them, etc. But learning to juggle a bunch of stuff and take responsibility for things is something that, if your kids learn to do it now, will only help them in a few months.
Bottom line: You never stop being their parent(s) but, if you really love them, start letting them "go" in terms of doing things on their own by themselves.
Ultimately, the test of too much or too little will be the junior officer's ability to solve problems on his or her own, advocate for themselves and forge their own way on their military path and in life. At some point, they have to start developing and practicing those skills in real world situations.
What we have here is diversity in parenting styles and level of involvement. As with most things, any style too far from a balanced center may have an adverse impact. For those candidates, appointees, mids and cadets who had too much (and the opinions on that are clearly infinite) parental hand-holding/support/involvement, they will either adjust, overcome, and rapidly grow that skill set, or they won't.
I rate this at half-price, .01 cents.
NavyHoops, Dadof2, unsa1985 and Capt MJ:
Thank you for the sage advice. Thank you for providing it without an arrogant and condescending tone. NavyHoops and Dadof2, I stand corrected on my statement that few candidates navigate this process without significant help their parents. Going forward, I will view my role in this process through a different prism. Since the day DS announced that he was interested in applying to USAFA, which has since broadened to all three service academies, he has driven the process, but I must say that I have pushed him on training for the CFA, studying for/taking the ACT, researching the academies, and of course maintaining his grades. However, the only phone call I have made was to his high school counselor, who had no information on or advice about the academies. This forum has been a gold mine of information about the process and we are thankful to have found it.
@ rjb and Brenmaron:
There is a lot of conflicting advice on this forum, as there is on any forum. Usually correct information gets provided through a back and forth discussion or a senior member provides a definitive answer... if there is one. There are some contributors, such as Christcorp, flieger83, Capt MJ, Pima, and Fencersmom to name of few, whose advice clearly deserves deference. Others on this forum, such as yourselves, will have your comments viewed with more discrimination. If your comments are arrogant, condescending, or too cute by half; they will not be effective in conveying your point.
That plus a buck and a half will get you a cup of coffee. I'm looking at you Otb. ;-)
P.S. Added NavyHoops to the list of contributors whose
comments deserve deference.
Last edited: