...but there are many issues that are raised on this Forum that have never been formally addressed, and until USNA makes a policy statement...the responses are simply opinions..
I think everybody who participates in this forum in the hope of gathering useful information understands that this is not an
official, USNA-sanctioned source of information. The same could be said about Wikipedia. The information there is
also "simply opinions". But, when you gather a lot of people together with a wide range of experience in dealing with the admissions process, in aggregate, I think you can develop some very accurate impressions that you would never get from simply reading the Academy's admissions website. Going to that website is a certainly a
must ... but it doesn't lend the granular details that can be gained from a quality forum like this.
Here is just a small example of the type of information you can get only here that you would
never get from the Academy's admissions website: Candidates often come here with questions and concerns about the CFA (Candidate Fitness Assessment). The Academy never advertises (not even to the BGOs) what it takes to "pass" the CFA. So, nobody really knows what it takes. Candidates often come here saying things like, "I only did 2 pull-ups. Should I retake the CFA? Did I fail? How many do I have to do to pass?" What we've learned over time, by seeing countless successful candidates with various levels of achievement on the CFA, and by their sharing there CFA results, is that the Academy places much more emphasis on the
running portion of the CFA. You should always try to do your best on all aspects of the CFA - and a candidate should certainly retake it if they think they can make some significant improvements; but, yes, you
can possibly pass with only 2 pull-ups. You did
not necessarily fail the CFA. The academy may consider other things about your athletic profile that will cause them to overlook this seemingly "failing" achievement.