rjb
10-Year Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2014
- Messages
- 521
It means that the Academy where MEET them where they are, but not necessarily ACCEPT them where they are. So if a cadet - due to upbringing or whatever reason - is less than honest, USAFA will not accept them into the Academy, but may help to get them into a more appropriate placement.From the article:
“We realize that everybody doesn’t come from the same background. They don’t have the same focus or view of living honorably, and we have to meet them where they are,” Clark said. “Now, that doesn’t mean that we have to accept where they are. But we have to … help them to get where we need them to be.”
I wonder what exactly the mean by that.
Not old... wise“We realize that everybody doesn’t come from the same background. They don’t have the same focus or view of living honorably, and we have to meet them where they are,” Clark said. “Now, that doesn’t mean that we have to accept where they are. But we have to … help them to get where we need them to be.”
I wonder what exactly they mean by that."
Taking off ALO hat, Mod Hat, and putting on "old grad" hat...
I think what it means is: "there's no way on God's green earth we're going to disenroll 200+ violators of the honor code. It would be a national scandal, it would REALLY look bad for the academy, and it could be a political minefield."
I mean, there's precedent for NOT enforcing the honor code isn't there? I mean...oh, wait...let's think...
1965 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 109 cadets disenrolled and given discharges ranging from honorable to other than honorable.
1967 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 46 cadets disenrolled (I couldn't find discharge types)
1972 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 39 cadets disenrolled (I couldn't find discharge types)
There are others...
And now this one...245 cadets violated the honor code. And we're trying to "socially understand" that it's not their fault, they didn't really make a conscious decision to cheat, that it was socially engineered by society to be a part of their inner psyche?
BOVINE SCATOLOGY!
(with thanks to the late General H. Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr.)
Let's see...I received the same lessons on the honor code during BCT that these people did. I had LOTS of chances to speak with honor reps, to do a "what if..." with them. We had honor boards all year and ALL cadets were required to read the results and initial a document attesting to having done so. Many of us sat on those boards. We saw first-hand how the code was administered. And we didn't have "probation" for a finding of guilty.
There were three possible outcomes of an honor board:
1. Guilty of violating the honor code
2. Guilty of violating the honor code but with a recommendation to the Commandant of Cadets for Discretion
3. A finding of no violation
That was it. The first one saw you leaving the academy within @10 days. The second...your fate was in the hands of the Commandant. The third...you went back to the wing. I both loved and feared the honor code. I loved the fact that I could leave things in my room (we didn't have keys to lock the doors then) and never worry about anything disappearing. I feared the very thought of someone thinking I might have stepped over the line. I think it might have been easy to cheat in my math classes but I was SO afraid of being before an honor board...I could accept academic failure and my family could have to. But to be sent home for honor? I couldn't live with that.
And I saw the pain, the absolute soul-crushing results of an honor violation. A good friend of mine, a classmate, a gent I'd known from the first minutes of BCT...made a mistake during a final exam three weeks before graduation. He ended up before an honor board. He was found in violation (he admitted everything, said he'd made a mistake). The SECAF had to be consulted on his case as it was so close to graduation. The decision was that he would graduate with the class, he would NOT receive his commission, and he would immediately be ordered to active duty in an enlisted status for five years.
(I have a problem with that solution, but that's for another rant)
When I think of him, and others...this "solution" of USAFA is, to me, insulting to their memory and to the graduates that came before.
Okay, old guy rant over...
(Geez, I sound old...)
Forgive my curiosity, and unrelated to the topic, but how would this affect those guys' draft status if the discharges were other than honorable? There was more than a slight risk of ending up carrying a rifle in a swamp, PFC-style, unless this made them ineligible to serve.I mean, there's precedent for NOT enforcing the honor code isn't there? I mean...oh, wait...let's think...
1965 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 109 cadets disenrolled and given discharges ranging from honorable to other than honorable.
1967 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 46 cadets disenrolled (I couldn't find discharge types)
1972 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 39 cadets disenrolled (I couldn't find discharge types)
There are others...
Not old... wise![]()
This might be a post that stays with me. For a long time. Thank you @flieger83“We realize that everybody doesn’t come from the same background. They don’t have the same focus or view of living honorably, and we have to meet them where they are,” Clark said. “Now, that doesn’t mean that we have to accept where they are. But we have to … help them to get where we need them to be.”
I wonder what exactly they mean by that."
Taking off ALO hat, Mod Hat, and putting on "old grad" hat...
I think what it means is: "there's no way on God's green earth we're going to disenroll 200+ violators of the honor code. It would be a national scandal, it would REALLY look bad for the academy, and it could be a political minefield."
I mean, there's precedent for NOT enforcing the honor code isn't there? I mean...oh, wait...let's think...
1965 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 109 cadets disenrolled and given discharges ranging from honorable to other than honorable.
1967 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 46 cadets disenrolled (I couldn't find discharge types)
1972 Cheating Scandal at USAFA: 39 cadets disenrolled (I couldn't find discharge types)
There are others...
And now this one...245 cadets violated the honor code. And we're trying to "socially understand" that it's not their fault, they didn't really make a conscious decision to cheat, that it was socially engineered by society to be a part of their inner psyche?
BOVINE SCATOLOGY!
(with thanks to the late General H. Norman Schwarzkopf, Jr.)
Let's see...I received the same lessons on the honor code during BCT that these people did. I had LOTS of chances to speak with honor reps, to do a "what if..." with them. We had honor boards all year and ALL cadets were required to read the results and initial a document attesting to having done so. Many of us sat on those boards. We saw first-hand how the code was administered. And we didn't have "probation" for a finding of guilty.
There were three possible outcomes of an honor board:
1. Guilty of violating the honor code
2. Guilty of violating the honor code but with a recommendation to the Commandant of Cadets for Discretion
3. A finding of no violation
That was it. The first one saw you leaving the academy within @10 days. The second...your fate was in the hands of the Commandant. The third...you went back to the wing. I both loved and feared the honor code. I loved the fact that I could leave things in my room (we didn't have keys to lock the doors then) and never worry about anything disappearing. I feared the very thought of someone thinking I might have stepped over the line. I think it might have been easy to cheat in my math classes but I was SO afraid of being before an honor board...I could accept academic failure and my family could have to. But to be sent home for honor? I couldn't live with that.
And I saw the pain, the absolute soul-crushing results of an honor violation. A good friend of mine, a classmate, a gent I'd known from the first minutes of BCT...made a mistake during a final exam three weeks before graduation. He ended up before an honor board. He was found in violation (he admitted everything, said he'd made a mistake). The SECAF had to be consulted on his case as it was so close to graduation. The decision was that he would graduate with the class, he would NOT receive his commission, and he would immediately be ordered to active duty in an enlisted status for five years.
(I have a problem with that solution, but that's for another rant)
When I think of him, and others...this "solution" of USAFA is, to me, insulting to their memory and to the graduates that came before.
Okay, old guy rant over...
(Geez, I sound old...)
A few?When you watch 4,000 cadets or Mids walk by, one after the other for about 20 minutes, you realize right away it’s OK to toss out a few cheaters, drop some for failure to meet standards, or let a few pursue a professional sports deferment. There’s more than enough of them (not even counting OCS and ROTC) to insist on an honor code. And for all sorts of reasons, they should.