- Joined
- Aug 29, 2010
- Messages
- 95
LOA received on Sept. 9th -North Carolina.
Didn't get accepted to summer seminar but I am attending the October
CVW
Didn't get accepted to summer seminar but I am attending the October
CVW
LOA received on Sept. 9th -North Carolina.
Didn't get accepted to summer seminar but I am attending the October
CVW
Just received my LOA in the mail this past evening
I was technically considered medically disqualified earlier due to my Astigmatism. I suppose I received or will receive a waiver for it? The only items it said I had to complete to be offered a full appointment is a nomination.
March 2011.When should I begin waiting outside for the mailman?
This brings up an interesting question. Obviously most candidates would prefer to have an LOA rather than not...if given a choice. However, would you rather NOT have your MOCs know that you have one so that you have an equal opportunity to receive a Nom from them, or does the fact that you have an LOA increase your odds of receiving a Nom from some source enough to offset the chances that your MOC won't give you his/her Nom? Any opinions? The SAs advising your MOCs of an LOA seems like a double edge sword.Some Congressmen may be more likely to grant a nomination to a candidate with an LOA, knowing he/she has a strong package. Others may not, figuring that USNA will find a nomination for that candidate..
..DO NOT assume USNA will find you a nomination because you are in possession of an LOA. Do all you can do to get one on your own..
..What if a bunch of LOA holders do not receive noms from their MOC's and USNA does not have enough to go around?..
Yes they are, and it is not something that a candidate can control, My question was just one of speculation. Do people think it is helpful or detrimental to the probabilities of receiving a MOC Nom? I 'guess" that the SAs must believe it helps your chances of receiving a MOC Nom otherwise what would be the benefit of notifying a candidates MOC?Sounds like the SA's are notifying them anyway.