A nom is a nom.Does anyone know AFA weights nominations differently depending on type - county, senator, presidential, etc....
As stated above, a nom is a nom. However, I have found from personal experience a nomination from a representative is easier to receive than a senator nomination, just less competition.Does anyone know AFA weights nominations differently depending on type - county, senator, presidential, etc....
my son received a nom from our CA state senator but not our local congresswoman. I was curious if the senatorial held more weight?As stated above, a nom is a nom. However, I have found from personal experience a nomination from a representative is easier to receive than a senator nomination, just less competition.
No, I believe not.my son received a nom from our CA state senator but not our local congresswoman. I was curious if the senatorial held more weight?
A nom is a nom is a nom. One does not outweigh the other. Some MOCs coordinate their slates, others don’t. Beware reading too much into the source of noms, the nature of slates, and the number of noms.my son received a nom from our CA state senator but not our local congresswoman. I was curious if the senatorial held more weight?
my son received a nom from our CA state senator but not our local congresswoman. I was curious if the senatorial held more weight?
What do you mean ‘holds weight over all the rest’?From what I researched I don’t think so, but a principal nomination holds weight over all the rest.
I recommend going to the top of the Nominations forum and reading the Sticky Note pinned there.I thought Presidential would, just by the nature of how you get it. I thought they're almost assured a spot in SA.
What do you mean ‘holds weight over all the rest’?
A principal nomination for a qualified candidate is a GUARANTEED appointment Is it Federal Law. So the principal nomination is different from the other ones.Not necessarily. A nomination is a nomination. They don't prefer one over the other.
See link below, page 5, Note 16, which addresses the fact the language on principal noms does differ for USNA. They do usually follow the practice of giving a fully qualified (in USNA’s eyes, plus medical and CFA) applicant an appointment, regardless of whether they scored that candidate highest on the slate. The candidate might be minimally qualified, but the principal nom forces the appointment to be the one charged to the elected official. Fortunately, other fully qualified candidates on the slate may be offered an appointment and charged to other nom sources, so there is flexibility.A principal nomination for a qualified candidate is a GUARANTEED appointment Is it Federal Law. So the principal nomination is different from the other ones.
CAREER military parent as opposed to a veteran parent. Generally it is either a parent currently serving (active/reserve) or retired with 20 or more yrs of service.Presidential is a type of nomination given by the president. This is where the only 100 slots are available. Everyone who applies receives this but it's only for those with military connection.
Thank you for clarifying Capt MJ. So the USNA is the weird one, right? It is a joke people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!See link below, page 5, Note 16, which addresses the fact the language on principal noms does differ for USNA. They do usually follow the practice of giving a fully qualified (in USNA’s eyes, plus medical and CFA) applicant an appointment, regardless of whether they scored that candidate highest on the slate. The candidate might be minimally qualified, but the principal nom forces the appointment to be the one charged to the elected official. Fortunately, other fully qualified candidates on the slate may be offered an appointment and charged to other nom sources, so there is flexibility.
https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20191218_RL33213_f3a4006314d3a115f3b527e698866af2075056c5.pdf
Yes, indeed it is!Thank you for clarifying Capt MJ. So the USNA is the weird one, right? It is a joke people!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!