If the current system of requiring the class to be spread across the country by MOC Nomination is antiquated? How does anyone propose a system that gives a potential candidate a fair chance who might live in the middle of no where, USA? I've seen alot of complaints about competitive districts not getting enough appointments ( all of which seem to be people who live in these districts), but I don't see many comments or concerns about making sure potential candidates that don't live on the coasts having the same equal chance at a appointment.
Yes the USCGA and USMMA has no nominations, but there entire school size is less then one class of the other academies. By definition of size they are already more selective since they have so few spots every year. There are also so small that Congress doesn't care about them which is why the no nominations decision was likely made. The demand for application to these schools is also much lower than the other academies. Not saying they are not amazing. It is just fact that the demand is much lower.
USAFA, USNA, and USMA are considered the prominent academy's in the country ; therefore, I think it is important that the entire country is represented each class at these academies. Without some constraints of the amount of candidates from one area to these academies, I have no doubt that there would be a move to only look at these competitive districts and start to ignore other parts of the country. Now I am not saying it will be a diliberate, sinister, or purposeful move. It will likely be small subconscious decisions made that would promote the coasts and place disadvantages for other areas. Shouldn't the district in Middle of No Where, USA have a EQUAL shot of appointments as candidates at Maryland, DC, San Diego, etc?
I'm not saying that MOC's having the nomination control is the best system. I am a firm beleiver that politicians will make 100 bad decisions for every good decision, but no one has come up with a idea that completes the mission as it is done today in a better way. Atleast I have not seen one on this thread that doesn't disporprtionaly support competitive districts more than the rest of the country.
Like many other things in life, the choice of how to manage the selection process for the Service Academies is a COMPROMISE.
In the modern era here in the US, we are obsessed with fairness especially in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion and here, I'm not just speaking
about race/ethnicity but also place of birth/origin.
From a MILTARY STANDPOINT, and I'm talking about recruiting the most effective military force that will, in the case of the Service Academies,
provide the absolute best leaders, pilots, submarine drivers, mariners, etc to lead our forces and nation.
The COMPROMISE here is how to combine the two in a way that maximizes the latter while still trying to achieve the former. Is it FAIR that
an applicant from Flyspeck, Wyoming has a Whole Person Multiple that is lower because she does not get the advanced classes that
BigTown, Virginia offers and her school does not do SAT prep nor offer gym class after 9th grade? Probably not but conversely, the need for
advanced math proficiency UPON ARRIVAL at USNA drives a lot of the admissions decision space. Conversely, that same applicant
from Flyspeck, Wyoming might be the only applicant from her congressional district while the applicant in BigTown, Virginia might have
ten applicants in just their high school and all with advanced math, AP science, etc.
I don't claim to be an admissions insider by any means but my take is that if we did away with the entire MOC nomination process,
we would see a LOT MORE kids from the "Bigtown, State" (very competitive) areas and a lot fewer from places like Flyspeck, Wyoming
and for that matter Bismarck, North Dakota (home of my classmate, former USNA Supe Jeff Fowler).
We have an imperfect system but I don't see a better way to balance military need with geographic as well as general diversity.