I swore I would drop out of this thread. I feel it's my duty to insult and try to humiliate you before you commission so that you learn something about humiliating yourself before it's done by someone who can really matter in your life.
What are you calling the nuclear era?
When did Mao and Stalin live?
Were they dictators?
When did the USSR and China develop nuclear weapons?
Ever heard of the Rosenbergs?
Setting aside your complete and total ignorance of history, do you really think that you and a few other internet armchair clown generals are really on to something? That you all see some opening that the national security apparatus has missed? What do think the evacuation of 10+ million folks from Seoul would look like? So do we leave the folks in Busan and Incheon or do we evacuate them too? Forget the NK nuke(s). What do you think 10's of thousands of rockets fired from thousands of launchers would look like?
You are one tough SOB!
I typed that and shortly thereafter realized that I had mixed up Mao with another historical figure lmao(notice that the post was edited 15 minutes after it was made). Slept 2 hours last night. I'm supposed to be humiliated because I made a mistake? Why don't you actually attack the points I'm making, and prove them wrong, instead of picking out small pieces of information and saying their wrong? That would "humiliate" me a lot more. What I said in that quoted post is not pertinent to the points I've made, they are simply pieces of misinformation that I stated. Yeah, I made a stupid mistake, mixed up historical figures, and shortly thereafter realized it and edited my post. I'm so embarrassed on this anonymous forum.
This is a discussion dude, I'm stating my damn opinion. You've never disagreed with what the government has done? So if I disagree with what the government is doing, all of a sudden I'm an armchair clown General?
There's no need to make personal attacks dude. It's a discussion, please either take part in the discussion, or leave it. And by taking part in the discussion, I mean attacking the points I am trying to make, not picking out the smallest minuteau like wether or not I used a metaphor and saying that I'm wrong.
Doesn't always take a tough SOB to be willing to fight for something, sometimes it just takes anger.
I'm "completely and totally ignorant of history", but you told me off for comparing the horribleness of the situation in NK with the holocaust... I later gave you some evidence to back up my point and you never responded to it. Do you honestly still believe it was ridiculous of me to compare NK to the holocaust after you read about the conditions of the prison camps in NK? Why did you stop bringing it up? Why do you insist on attacking the smallest of details and elect to ignore the big points I'm trying to make?
"What do you think 10's of thousands of rockets fired from thousands of launchers would look like?"
What do you think Kim Jong the 5th with his advanced nuclear technology lighting up half the planet would look like?